Not today. Sign-in is by email verification or Google, and single sign-on is not yet available.

Where can procurement review terms?

The Master Services Agreement is published in full, and a security overview covers how data is handled.

Can we track several brands in one account?

Yes. Each brand is a separate asset with its own topics, competitors and history, and data is scoped per tenant.

Enterprise and multi-brand

Answer the board's question with evidence, across every brand you own.

Track multiple brands and markets in one account, keep each tenant's data separate, and show the answer text and sources behind every number you report.

Show me my answers See pricing

ClaudeIllustrative

most trusted enterprise cybersecurity vendors 2026

Among enterprise security vendors, these are the most frequently cited:

1Palo Alto Networks
2CrowdStrike
3Fortinet

Your flagship brand: not mentioned

Analyst summaries and two trade titles produced this answer. Your flagship is well cited in its regional market but absent from the sources this question draws on.

Same question, five engines

ChatGPT

Google AI Overview#8

Perplexity

Claude

Gemini

Named by 1 of 5. One blended score would report a number that is true of no engine here, which is why each engine is kept separate.

Best fit for

Organisations with several brands, markets or business units
Teams that must show where a reported number came from
Buyers with procurement, security and contractual review

What you get

Every number opens to its evidence

Metrics are computed from stored runs, and each one can be traced back to the answers that produced it — the response text, the date, the engine and the sources cited.

Tenant separation by default

Data is scoped per tenant, and access to a brand is checked on every request rather than assumed from the session.

Contract and security review, ready

A published Master Services Agreement and a security overview exist for procurement to read, rather than being assembled during the deal.

Every brand you own, one board viewIllustrative

Brand / market	ChatGPT	Google	Perplexity
Flagship – EU	47%	52%	44%
Flagship – US	0%	8%	0%
Sub-brand – EU	22%	26%	19%
Acquired brand	0%	0%	3%

Each number opens to the answers behind it — the reply, the date, the engine and the sources cited — so a board slide can be defended line by line.

How it works

1
Onboard the brands
Each brand is its own asset with its own topics, competitors and history.
2
Track and compare
Read any metric per brand, per topic and per engine, and compare against the competitor set defined for each.
3
Report with the evidence attached
Export the rows behind any panel when a number needs to be defended.

What this does not do

Single sign-on and fine-grained role-based access control are not available today.
Access is per workspace, with staff-level access for support. Per-brand user permissioning is limited.
Coverage is the five engines listed. Regional or private assistants are not tracked.

Questions

Do you support SSO?: Not today. Sign-in is by email verification or Google, and single sign-on is not yet available.
Where can procurement review terms?: The Master Services Agreement is published in full, and a security overview covers how data is handled.
Can we track several brands in one account?: Yes. Each brand is a separate asset with its own topics, competitors and history, and data is scoped per tenant.

Find the evidence behind your AI visibility gaps.

Start with your brand website, review the generated measurement setup, and see the prompts, engines, competitors, and sources behind the first report.

Analyze My Brand